Patient feedback · cumulative results
Good service. Slow turnaround.
Sixteen patients completed the feedback form between 30 and 31 August 2026. Names, ages, genders and locations were removed before analysis. Everything below is a total or an average. No individual response is shown.
Responses
completed the feedback form
Information clarity
average out of 5
Satisfaction
average out of 5
Would recommend
answered yes. Nobody answered no.
The finding
Nobody said they would not recommend us, and satisfaction sits just under four out of five. Yet the free text is dominated by one word: time. Turnaround time, waiting time and the waiting area account for more comments than everything else combined. The service is acceptable. The wait around it is not.
Chart 1 · Service use
Responses by service. Twelve of sixteen used outpatient consultation.
Outpatient consultation is 75 percent of all responses, so a change there reaches the most people.
Chart 2 · Satisfaction by service
Average score out of 5. Two questions, asked separately on purpose.
Services with only two responses each are marked. Two people is not a reliable average, and it should not drive a decision on its own.
Waiting time
Most common: 15 to 30 minutes, reported by eleven of sixteen.
Preferred update channel
How patients want to hear about hours and services.
WhatsApp and SMS together are twelve of sixteen. A poster alone will not reach these patients.
What we do first
Decision one
Fix turnaround time in outpatient consultation. It is three quarters of all visits, it carries the lowest clarity score, and time is the single most repeated complaint in the free text.
Decision two
Add seating and clean the waiting area. Three separate patients raised the waiting lounge, chairs and washrooms without being asked about any of them.
Decision three
Send updates by WhatsApp and SMS, not by notice board. Twelve of sixteen chose one of those two channels.
In their own words
Free text answers, unedited. No name is attached to any of them.
The numbers behind the charts
| Service | Responses | % of total | Clarity | Satisfaction |
|---|
How this page protects patients
The form allowed a patient to give a name, age, gender and location, and some did. Those four columns were removed before anything on this page was calculated, and they are not in this file. Patients never see each other's feedback. Staff see totals and averages only. The free text is shown because it names the service, never the person.
Staff questionnaires · three forms
Assessing the clinic, and asking the staff.
The patient form tells us how a visit felt. It cannot tell us why the wait was long. These three forms ask the people who run the clinic. Choose a form to see it.
Signed in as staff member Change role
For the assessor
Every requirement, and where it is answered
The brief asks for four deliverables and one working feature. This page maps each one to the place it lives.
Working website Client site
Home, services and hours, health tips, about us, your visit, contact and feedback, built for patients.
- Visible service hours section on the Services and Hours page, with today highlighted and a live open or closed indicator on the home page.
- Working feedback button opening the live Google Form, on the home page, the contact page and the feedback page.
- Appointment request demonstration asking only service, day and time of day, and stating on submit that nothing is sent and nothing is confirmed.
- Two user types. Patients see the client site and never see feedback results. Staff open this dashboard from the footer of the same site, using an access code, and see cumulative results only.
Google Form and Excel workbook This page
Seven questions covering service used, waiting time band, clarity of information, satisfaction, preferred update channel, one improvement and whether they would recommend us. Sixteen responses collected.
- Analysis counts responses by service, gives the average satisfaction of 3.81, and identifies 15 to 30 minutes as the most common waiting range.
- Two charts for service use and satisfaction, labelled Chart 1 and Chart 2 in both the workbook and on this dashboard.
- Personal columns removed. Name, age, gender and location are stripped before analysis and do not appear anywhere on the published site.
Poster On the client site
Designed by the team and displayed on the About Us page of the client site, where it can be opened full size.
- The telephone number, address, opening hours and services on the poster match the website exactly.
- The QR code on the poster opens the same feedback form as the website button.
Ten slide presentation Submitted as a file
Exactly the ten slides the brief specifies, with speaker notes on every slide.
- 1 title and team · 2 problem and users · 3 goal and solution · 4 form design and privacy · 5 findings
- 6 Excel analysis and both charts · 7 website tour and working feature · 8 poster choices · 9 safety and testing · 10 team contribution
Safety and ethics rule
Only general health information appears anywhere: clean water, treated nets, handwashing, immunisation schedule, finishing a course of medicine. No diagnosis, no medicine named, no condition discussed. Every health section closes by telling the reader to speak to a qualified health worker, and every page of both sites carries the class demonstration label.
Submission links
| Item | Where |
|---|---|
| Client website | bulamu-clinic.pages.dev |
| Staff dashboard | bulamu-clinic.pages.dev/staff.html |
| Google Form | forms.gle link on the client site |
| Presentation | Q01_Nightingale_Presentation.pptx |
| Workbook | Q01_Nightingale_FormData.xlsx |
| Poster | Bulamu_Health_Centre_Poster.pdf |